Regulation in the Storm:

Emotional Regulation and Crisis Management for Clinicians in Real and Stressful Times

Mental health professionals are often called upon to be anchors in moments of crisis. Yet in the current American context—marked by political tension, social unrest, economic strain, community violence, and collective uncertainty—clinicians are not merely witnesses to stress; they are participants in it.

This article is written with deep respect for that reality. It does not assume distance, neutrality, or immunity. Instead, it offers a grounded discussion of emotional regulation and crisis management skills that honor both professional responsibility and human limitation.

Naming the Context Without Minimizing It

Before skills, there must be acknowledgment. Many clinicians are working with clients who are dysregulated because the world itself feels dysregulating. Attempts to pathologize these reactions—either in clients or ourselves—risk missing the point.

Fear, anger, grief, vigilance, numbness, and exhaustion are not signs of failure; they are understandable responses to prolonged stress and perceived threat. Effective regulation begins not with suppression, but with accurate identification and meaning-making.

When clinicians internally validate the reality of the moment, they are better positioned to help clients do the same.

Emotional Regulation: A Clinical Skill, Not a Personality Trait

Emotional regulation is often misunderstood as remaining calm at all times. In practice, it is the capacity to *notice internal states, modulate intensity, and choose responses aligned with values*.

For clinicians, this includes two simultaneous tasks:

1. Regulating enough to remain present and attuned

2. Allowing authentic emotional experience without acting it out or shutting it down

Core Regulation Skills for Clinicians

Tracking internal cues: noticing early signs of activation (tightness, urgency, dissociation, irritability) allows for intervention before overwhelm.

State-shifting tools: breath work, sensory grounding, movement, and orienting are not simplistic—they are neurobiological necessities during threat response.

Cognitive flexibility: gently challenging catastrophic or absolutist thinking supports regulation without denying reality.

After-action processing: intentionally reflecting after intense sessions helps discharge residual activation rather than carrying it forward.

Regulation is dynamic. It is less about staying steady and more about returning.

Crisis Management in the Therapy Room

In times of heightened societal stress, clinicians may see increased presentations of suicidal ideation, panic, trauma responses, anger, and despair. Crisis management, then, becomes a frequent—not exceptional—part of practice.

Key Principles of Crisis Work

Safety first, but not safety alone: risk assessment is essential, yet clients also need to feel emotionally understood, not reduced to checklists.

Slowing the moment: crisis work often involves deceleration—lowering intensity, narrowing focus, and bringing attention to the immediate present.

Collaborative planning: involving clients in safety and coping plans restores agency during moments of perceived powerlessness.

Clinician self-regulation as intervention: a regulated clinician nervous system is one of the most powerful tools in crisis containment.

Importantly, crisis competence does not mean carrying responsibility alone. Consultation, documentation, and adherence to ethical and legal standards are acts of care—for both client and clinician.

Holding Dual Awareness: Individual Pain and Collective Reality

One of the unique challenges of the current climate is holding both individual client narratives and broader systemic stressors. Clients may be reacting not only to personal history, but to ongoing societal cues of danger or injustice.

Clinicians can support regulation by:

  • Validating that distress makes sense *in context*

  • Helping clients differentiate between what is controllable and what is not

  • Supporting values-based action rather than constant threat monitoring

This dual awareness prevents both minimization (“it’s just anxiety”) and overwhelm (“everything is dangerous”).

Preventing Clinician Burnout Through Crisis Saturation Awareness

Repeated exposure to crisis can lead to saturation, compassion fatigue, or moral injury. Emotional regulation skills must therefore extend beyond sessions.

Protective practices include:

  • Monitoring cumulative crisis exposure

  • Setting realistic limits on availability and caseload intensity

  • Seeking peer support that normalizes impact without catastrophizing

  • Remembering that *sustainability is an ethical issue*

Being a steady presence does not require being endlessly absorbent.

Crisis work in stressful times calls for humility, flexibility, and care—

both outward and inward. Emotional regulation is not about numbing ourselves to reality, but about staying connected enough to respond wisely.

When clinicians allow regulation to be a shared, practiced process rather than a private expectation, they model something profoundly healing: the ability to stay human in the storm.

Previous
Previous

Between Sessions, Between Breaths:

Next
Next

What Do We Do Now?